The scoring of the data was done strictly according to the guidelines and instructions provided in the manuals and keys of the respective items. After filling the information, and scoring the individual items, the total score is summed up and interpreted in terms of the class. Revised socioeconomic status scale for urban and rural india revision for 2015 been proposed for classifying different populations by socioeconomic status. Components weighted score components weighted score. The first well known such classification was the one proposed by prasad 1961 based on the per capita monthly income. Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree. This tool measures role space and role set conflict. It contains a repertoire of psychological tests, questionnaires, selfevaluation tests, projective techniques and other instruments that have been used by organisations in different countries.
Pfeiffers classic inventories, questionnaires, and surveys for training and development gathers the very best leadership and managementrelated assessments, instruments, and surveys from the acclaimed pfeiffer annuals. Determination of ses of a family in a rural area the. The parameters were modified as education and occupation. Socioeconomic status scales updated for 2017 international. Training instruments for hrd and od contains a repertoire of psychological tests, questionnaires, selfevaluation tests, projective techniques and other instruments. Organization role stress ors scale developed and standardized by udai pareek 1983 was administered to collect the data. Wealth index scale rahudkar scale 1960 shirpurkar scale 1964 jalota scale 1970 kulshreshta scale 1972 srivastava scale 1978 bhardwaj scale 2001 other scales 12. Training instruments in hrd and od by udai pareek and.
Pareeks scale tables 1 and 2 was developed by pareek for calculating the. Therefore, descriptive cross sectional type of research was the most appropriate design for the present study. It is a famous questionnaire used to measure the organizational ethos. Work life balance kindly send me the 36 item work life.
Udai pareek is the author of udai pareeks understanding organizational behaviour 3. Purchase training instruments in hrd and od by udai pareek and surabhi purohit online. Occupational role stress scale development 227 extrinsic rewards increase pay scale, conflict with boss or subordinates, ambiguity about job security and many more. The purpose of this assessment instrument is to heighten your awareness of the. I am currently doing a research on work life balance for my bachelor degree. Impact of socioeconomic status on municipal solid waste.
Chattopadhyay 1965 farmers value orientation scale, manas, 12 1, 534. It has been extensively revised to include new topics, examples, and case studies. Personal effectiveness scale, developed by prof udai pareek 1, was administered on 74 public health management personnel, who attended various leadership and management training programmes during 20092012, in south east asia region sear. I hope someone could help me and answer my request. Written for consultants, training directors, and human resource professionals charged with leadership and management developmenteach tool presented in the collection. Prasad and udai pareek socioeconomic scales for 2017. Pfeiffers classic inventories, questionnaires, and. Udai pareeks, work life balance scale was utilized to collect primary data and it was analyzed using spss 16.
Questionnaire for selfassessing your worklife balance. Revised socioeconomic status scale rural by udai pareek and. Firstly, maoc has been assessed as a good inventory. Kuppus wamy scale was developed for assessing the ses of an urban individual. They have given how to calculate the score but it is nowhere written how to interpret the final score. Udai pareekh scale does not collect information on income, so the data collected with this scale may be more valid. Pdf kuppuswamy s socio economic status scale a revision.
I was looking at the wlb scale developed by udai pareek with the assistance of abha joshi in the book, training instruments in hrd and od, third edition. The instrument included six needs or motives and twelve dimensions of organisational climate that were ranked by individuals according to their perception to find out the climate. In india variety of methods of classifying the population by socioeconomic status have been proposed such as rahudkar scale 1960, udai parikh scale 1964, jalota scale 1970, and kulshrestha scale 1972. Kuppuswamy scale, and uday pareek scale used for both. Shiv shakti international journal of in multidisciplinary. Organizational role stress scale ors scale by udai pareek. Description of tools used a maslach burnout inventory mbi though original maslach burnout inventory was designed to measure. Personal effectiveness, organizational culture and work. Rahudkar scale 1960, udai parikh scale 1964, jalota scale 1970, kulshrestha scale 1972. Test carries 50 items which are rated at five point scale. Socio eonomic status scale in india linkedin slideshare. Role stress scales role stress scales manual sage journals. Volume 1, issue 1, december 20 indian journal of community medicine vol. Sixth udai pareek memorial lecture by padma bhushan dr.
Organisational role stress ors and life satisfaction among female doctors shipra khanna dr. Entrepreneurs, like all creative people, have to contend constantly with various kinds of mental stresses springing from a variety of sources. Thus, a range of instruments like psychological tests, questionnaires, selfevaluation tests and projective techniques have been devised for assessing, appraising and evaluating various aspects of human behaviour. The copy of the book is not available in my country. Socioeconomic status scale in india linkedin slideshare. Socioeconomic status scalesmodified kuppuswamy and udai. Revised udai pareek socioeconomic status scale rural. A systematic understanding of human psyche, behaviour and potential is the key to individual and organisational effectiveness. Evaluation of ses of a family would mean the categorization of the family in respect of defined variables such as, education, occupation, economic status. Training instruments in hrd and od sage publications inc. Now days people faces a lot of challenges in balancing their work and personal life, due to. To collect primary data, a structured questionnaire developed by udai pareek was used. Buy udai pareeks understanding organizational behaviour. She has over fifteen years of experience in teaching.
It was prof pareek who introduced the concept of management, leadership, organization culture. Among the 60 families surveyed at rural setting, it was observed from table 1 that, majority 40 67% belonged to high class when the sli scale was applied. We are making an attempt to provide an updated kuppuswamy and udai pareekhs socioeconomic scales for 2019. Secondary data was collected from magazines, journals, research articles. The total score on each role stress ranges from 5 to 25 and the total ors score from 50 to 250. Tata mcgrawhill education, 2010 organizational behavior 639 pages. When for the same families pareek scale was applied, majority 30, i. Query regarding work life balance scale of udai pareek.
It took three parameters into account, namely, education, occupation, and income of the individual it was modified to enable ses assessment of a family rather than an individual. Some of the facets of the scale sometimes create confusion and require explanation on how to classify, and need some minor updates to bring the scale uptodate. He contributed a lot to the field of organizational behavior and hrd. The ratings of five items are totalled to get the total. Four alternatives are given for each situation, and respondents were asked to select one of them that they would use if they were leader in that situation. Uday pareekh classification is used for rural areas which takes into account. Pdf socioeconomic status scalesmodified kuppuswamy and. The ors is a widely used instrument to measure these role stressors. This scale has nine factors which assess the socioeconomic status of the individual as shown in table 3. Research design 81 the current research, studies the present status of work life balance and some related factors in the banking sector. The instrument consists of 12 situations, each posing a problem for action. Sushama khanna is the dean and director outreach, udai pareek hrlabs, empi business school, new delhi. Pdf on jul 1, 2019, rabbanie tariq wani and others published socioeconomic status scales.
Rahudkar scale 1960, udai parikh scale 1964, jalota scale 1970, kulshrestha scale 1972, kuppuswamy scale. Trivedi 1964 attempts to examine the socioeconomic status for the rural or mixed population only this scale consists of a manual and one information blank this scale has nine factors which assess the socioeconomic status of the individual 15. The fourth edition of understanding organizational behaviour is a comprehensive textbook tailored to meet the needs of postgraduate management students. Udai pareek the instrument is based on the theory of situational leadership by hersey and blanchard 1982.
Dr pareek, fondly called udai by those of us who have had the good fortune of knowing him and aptly called the father of the hrd and od movement in india, passed away on march 21, 2010. This publication is a technical manual for the ors. In the present study 120 families were visited and interviewed. She has supervised more than 50 dissertations and theses. Training instruments in hrd and od is an outcome of dr udai pareeks rich worldwide experience of more than 50 years with diverse organisations, hrd professionals, researchers, students and trainers.
Organisational climate from view point of motivation in. The udai pareek scale was used to measure the socioeconomic status. This questionnaire is of great help to me while doing my project on implementation of knowledge management in isrosac. Udai pareek socioeconomic status scale it attempts to examine the socioeconomic status for rural population. Organizational role stress among managers in the indian. Several methods or scales have been proposed for classifying different populations by socioeconomic status. This scale has nine factors which assess the socioeconomic status of the individual. Kuppuswamys socioeconomic status scale is extensively used in urban population, for assessment of the ses 2.
Buy isbn9780070147645 at 23% discount by tata mcgraw hill education private limited. Relationship between organizational commitment and. Attempts to examine the socioeconomic status for rural population. The transactional model of stress is one in which stress is regarded as an individuals perceptual phenomenon rooted in. Trivedi 1964 kuppuswamy scale 1962 b g prasad classification proposed in the. In children, bronchial asthma is a common disease and an.
Uday pareek scale for assessing socioeconomic status of a family in rural. Original articles the national medical journal of india, on the. Purohit has been teaching human development home science for the last 27 years at university of rajasthan, jaipur. She has authored more than 50 articles, papers and books.
Personal effectiveness scale teachers pareek, 2001, organizational culture profile pareek, 2003 and stress indicator tool kelly, 2004 were administered to a sample of 320 teachers working in cbse schools n80. Kindly send me the 36 item work life balance scale developed by prof udai pareek. The late udai pareek was the distinguished visiting professor at the indian institute of health management research, jaipur. The sample size was 40 female doctors, age 25 to 60 years from hospitals in shimla. Many of these instruments have been used by organisations based in different countries, including the phillippines, malaysia, indonesia, ireland, canada and usa. Prof udai pareek director national institute of health management jaipur for the following. The choice of maoc was made for the following reasons. One often comes across challenges of coordination not only in interdepartmental settings, but also between field staff and head office staff, leading to misunderstandings, distrust, frustration or at least suboptimal results. Socioeconomic status scalesmodified kuppuswamy and udai pareekhs scale updated for 2019.
Organisational role stress ors and life satisfaction. Singh 1965 values and communication behaviour in a farming community journal of the indian academy of applied psychology, 2, 101 105. The book explores the core concepts and theories of organizational behaviour ob through managerial applications. Iowa farm operators and farm landlords knowledge of, participation in, and acceptance of the old age and survivors insurance program. An exploratory study on socio economic status scales in a. Your response would be of great help to pursue my research. An online tool is available for realtime updating of the scale 3. This is the most commonly used scale for determining the ses of an urban family.
1336 405 1301 850 16 198 1026 498 772 865 119 4 3 1363 1413 1446 333 1151 349 958 481 242 955 1315 1444 914 1169 895 327 760